2008 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 355 kg more than 2005 Rover 75.
Because 2008 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Freelander | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Land Rover | Rover |
Model | Freelander | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1770 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |