2008 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1982 Volvo 265
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 265. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 265.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover LR2 | 1982 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | LR2 | 265 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 317 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |