2008 Land Rover LR2 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover LR2 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | LR2 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 317 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1400 mm |
