2008 Land Rover LR2 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2008 Land Rover LR2. (230 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2008 Land Rover LR2.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover LR2 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | LR2 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 317 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |