2008 Land Rover LR2 vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Land Rover LR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Land Rover LR2 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-150.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-150 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover LR2 | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | LR2 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 317 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 125 L |