2008 Land Rover LR2 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Land Rover LR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Land Rover LR2 would be higher.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Citroen C-Zero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover LR2 | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Land Rover | Citroen |
Model | LR2 | C-Zero |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2180 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2550 mm |