2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
| Make | Land Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4197 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
