2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1963 kg more than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 557 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Land Rover | MG |
Model | Range Rover Sport | 1100 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3630 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2788 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |