2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1966 NSU Wankel Spider
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1745 kg more than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (440 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1966 NSU Wankel Spider | |
Make | Land Rover | NSU |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Wankel Spider |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 497 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2480 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 34 L |