2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 334 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (570 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4197 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
