2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 2014 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 568 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Land Rover | ZAZ |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | 966 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3630 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 640 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2788 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2170 mm |
