2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1978 Seat 133
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 133 would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1978 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 133.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Seat 133. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (570 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 516 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1978 Seat 133 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Seat |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | 133 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4197 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2030 mm |
