2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1306 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Land Rover | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Range Rover Sport | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3630 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2788 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |
