2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (385 HP) has 326 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1382 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (550 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 550 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2572 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |