2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1443 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (640 Nm) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover Sport | CU-X |
Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3630 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2788 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 80 L |