2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (400 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (570 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. (439 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Land Rover | Land Rover |
Model | Range Rover Sport | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 570 Nm | 439 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |