2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 3,630 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover Sport | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3630 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 60 L |