2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | Range Rover | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1943 |
Engine Size | 4394 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3260 mm |