2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1951 Renault Juva
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1735 kg more than 1951 Renault Juva.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1951 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover | Juva |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2545 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
