2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 2337 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 617 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover | R 360 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 23 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 55 L |