2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1972 Seat 1430
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1430. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1430 would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1787 kg more than 1972 Seat 1430.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Seat 1430. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 528 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Seat 1430. (112 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Seat 1430.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1972 Seat 1430 | |
Make | Land Rover | Seat |
Model | Range Rover | 1430 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 1438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |