2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1981 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1347 kg more than 1981 Volvo 260.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 260. (231 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1981 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | Range Rover | 260 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |