2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1985 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1017 kg more than 1985 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Lincoln Continental. (338 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Lincoln Continental.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1985 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Land Rover | Lincoln |
Model | Range Rover | Continental |
Year Released | 2008 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |