2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1994 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1137 kg more than 1994 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Fairlane. (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1994 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2930 mm |