2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1682 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 488 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Land Rover | Suzuki |
| Model | Range Rover | Baleno |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3628 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 640 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |
