2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 717 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | Range Rover | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 81 L |