2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (391 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 358 kg more than 2004 Nissan Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (560 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | Armada |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4197 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 391 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2632 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 106 L |