2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,628 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1307 kg more than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Land Rover Range Rover | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Range Rover | B3000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3628 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 640 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2717 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 74 L |