2008 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2006 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 641 kg more than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (640 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mountaineer.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Land Rover Range Rover 2006 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Land Rover Mercury
Model Range Rover Mountaineer
Year Released 2008 2006
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3628 cc 4015 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 210 HP
Torque 640 Nm 344 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 100 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.3:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2717 kg 2076 kg
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 105 L 85 L