2008 Lincoln Navigator vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2008 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 691 kg more than 2008 Lincoln Navigator.
Because 2008 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Lincoln Navigator | 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Lincoln | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Navigator | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5406 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1544 kg | 2235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 127 L | 107 L |