2008 Lincoln Navigator vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lincoln Navigator (300 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2008 Lincoln Navigator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln Navigator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Lincoln Navigator (496 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2008 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Lincoln Navigator | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Navigator | FTO |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 496 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5300 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1300 mm |
