2008 Lotus Elise vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Lotus Elise. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Lotus Elise would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2008 Lotus Elise. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2008 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 715 kg more than 2008 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Lotus Elise. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Lotus Elise. 2010 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2008 Lotus Elise has manual transmission. 2008 Lotus Elise will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Lotus Elise | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Lotus | Jaguar |
Model | Elise | XJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 541 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.2 seconds | 5.3 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |