2008 Maybach 62 vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2008 Maybach 62 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2008 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Maybach 62 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 476 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1575 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 753 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Maybach 62 | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Maybach | Triumph |
| Model | 62 | Renown |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5513 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 542 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 900 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2855 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3830 mm | 2750 mm |
