2008 Maybach 62 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Maybach 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 5 would be higher. At 5,978 cc (12 cylinders), 2008 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Maybach 62 (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 447 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2008 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Maybach 62 (1,000 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 799 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Maybach 62 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Maybach | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 5 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5978 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 604 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 1000 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6170 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3830 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.3 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 110 L | 60 L |