2008 Mazda 2 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Mazda 2 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 965 kg more than 2008 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover Range Rover (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 2. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 2 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | 2 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71.9 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 93 L |
