2008 Mazda 2 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Mazda 2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 2 weights approximately 299 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 2 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 2 | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1329 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |