2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |