2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 3 | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 3 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |
