2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 3 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |