2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Because 1973 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 3 | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 3 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1295 cc |
| Horse Power | 257 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2430 mm |
