2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | 260 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2664 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2660 mm |