2008 Mazda 3 vs. 1987 Holden Camira
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (111 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 1987 Holden Camira | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Camira |
Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2580 mm |