2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata E would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2000 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata E.
Because 2000 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 3 | E |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2810 mm |