2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Vector M12
To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Vector M12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Vector M12 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Vector M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Vector M12 weights approximately 438 kg more than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 2004 Vector M12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Vector M12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Vector M12 (576 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Vector M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2004 Vector M12 | |
Make | Mazda | Vector |
Model | 3 | M12 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 484 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1192 kg | 1630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |