2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (146 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3. 2010 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 360 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |