2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 4007. (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 4007.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 3 | 2010 Peugeot 4007 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | 3 | 4007 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 16.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
