2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (257 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 380 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | 3 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2179 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |