2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 186 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Mazda 3 | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | 3 | C-Zero |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |
