2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max

To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (113 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 240 kg more than 2008 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford C-Max (300 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (187 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Mazda 3 2012 Ford C-Max
Make Mazda Ford
Model 3 C-Max
Year Released 2008 2012
Body Type Hatchback Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3750 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1310 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1828 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1684 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2788 mm