2008 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3. 2012 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Mazda 3 | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 3 | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 257 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |